enticing rumors, but beware of the trap

Rumors concerning an improved iPhone 17 image refreshment rate has been circulating for several months. You’ve probably heard of the fact that all the next generation models should go to a 120 Hz display, including the standard versions and the new iPhone 17 Air.

This evolution would mark a turning point for Apple, which currently reserves this display fluidity for pro models. The basic iPhone 16 currently offers a fixed rate of 60 Hz.

For those who do not know, the cooling rate is the number of times per second that a screen displays a new image. The higher it is, the more everything seems fluid. Like a cartoon that moves better when he has more images per second.

Significant precision has just been provided by A Chinese informant. According to his declarations, the passage to 120 Hz over the whole range is confirmed, but with a size nuance: it would be a Fixed rate and not of Apple Adaptive Promotion Technology. This technical difference could have important implications for the autonomy and features of future iPhone.

No products found.

A source that contradicts the previous ambiguities?

The Focus Digital Fixed Focus has published this clarification on the Weibo social network. His words are unequivocal:

“This is an ordinary 120 Hz screen, not a promotion screen with adaptive refresh rate. »»

This statement is supposed to bring clarification to previous rumors. They evoked as a reminder the arrival of more fluid screens, without however specifying their exact nature.

The reliability of this source nevertheless remains to be considered with caution. Fixed Focus Digital has properly anticipated the name of the iPhone 16th earlier this year, but its overall assessment remains mixed.

Concrete implications on user experience

The distinction between a fixed 120 Hz screen and promotion technology is not just a simple technical nuance. Promotion makes it possible to automatically adapt the display frequency between 1 Hz and 120 Hz according to the displayed content, considerably saving the battery when displaying static elements.

Without this adaptive capacity, the standard and air iPhone 17 could see their significantly reduced autonomy compared to pro models. You would not benefit from features such as the Always-On screen, which allows you to permanently display the time on the screen.

Apple would thus maintain a clear differentiation between its product ranges, while offering better display fluidity on its standard models.

Fixed rate = unlikely, for several reasons

William Gallagher from Appleinsider thinks thatIt is unlikely that Apple offers a fixed rate of 120 Hz. It would indeed be curious that Apple opts for this solution which has little use for ordinary people. You can certainly see a difference between 120 Hz and 60 Hz by scrolling any page, but is it really useful for ordinary people?

A refreshment rate of the 120 Hz fixed screen is mainly interested in confirmed players who attach importance to this parameter, or accustomed people. On the other hand, promotion with variable rate is useful for more people.

Finally, it is good to remember that technology is available from the iPhone 14 Pro. It therefore seems logical that Apple can now achieve sufficient economies of scale for Integrate it more widely into its range. This would make the scenario of a simple 120 Hz fixed less likely.

i-nfo.fr - Iphon.fr official appi-nfo.fr - Iphon.fr official app
pocketphotography.com – Iphon.fr official app

By: keleops ag

Rate this post

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top